BALBIR SINGH Vs. HARPREET KAUR
LAWS(P&H)-1993-1-98
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on January 22,1993

BALBIR SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
HARPREET KAUR Respondents

JUDGEMENT

J.B.GARG,J - (1.) BALBIR Singh, the husband, Pritam Singh and Pritam Kaur, the parents of the husband, Joginder Singh and Jaswinder Singh, the two brothers of the husband and Manjit Kaur wife of the aforesaid brother Joginder Singh, have moved this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying that a complaint instituted by Harpreet Kaur for offences under Sections 403, 406 and 498-A of the Indian Penal Code together with the summoning Order dated 15-6-1992, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat, be quashed.
(2.) IT has been alleged that Balbir Singh was married to Harpreet Kaur on 7-10-1990; that it was a simple marriage; that there was no entrustment of any articles of dowry to the petitioners No. 2 to 6; that the prayer of the complainant was that her complaint may be sent to the police under Section 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Chief Judicial Magistrate travelled far away and summoned the petitioners. The mere fact that the Chief Judicial Magistrate did not send the complaint to the police for inquiry though it was desired by the complainant, would not render the impugned Order as void ab initio inasmuch as the Chief Judicial Magistrate, recorded the statement of the complainant and also Joginder Singh the father of the complainant and together with the documentary evidence whatever it was he passed the impugned order.
(3.) THE question which requires consideration here is whether the summoning of the husband, his parents, two brothers and the wife of one brother or in other words say the entire members of the family, was justified.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.