AMIN CHAND Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
LAWS(P&H)-1993-9-120
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on September 28,1993

AMIN CHAND Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.S.GREWAL,J - (1.) AMIN Chand petitioner, was convicted vide order of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Fatehgarh Sahib, dated 29-2-1992 under Section 304-A, Indian Penal Code, and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to Pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further rigorous Imprisonment for three months. The petitioner was also convicted under Section 279, Indian Penal Code, by the trial court and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Appeal filed against the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned trial Magistrate was dismissed vide order of Addl. Sessions Judge Patiala, dated 10 9-1993.
(2.) AGGRIEVED against the order of conviction and sentence passed by the courts below, the petitioner has filed the present revision petition, which was admitted only regarding sentence imposed upon the petitioner. In brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 29th November, 1988, Maghar Singh PW and Gurdas Ram (deceased) were proceeding from Patiala to their village Nalina Kalan on separate cycles. Gurdas Ram was going ahead of Maghar Singh. At about 6.30 P.M when they reached near fish farm of Nandpur Kesho, Fiat Car PAP-7999 driven by the petitioner rashly and negligently came from the opposite direction and dashed against the cycle of Gurdas Ram. As a result of the said collision, Gurdas Ram fell down and died at the spot, Case was reported to the police. After completion of the investigation, the petitioner was challaned tried, convicted and sentenced by the courts below as indicated above.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the parties were heard. On behalf of the petitioner, it was mainly contended that the petitioner in mid thirties; not a previous convict and he is the only bread winner of his family and way be released an probation. It was further submitted that the petitioner has also undergone agony of trial for about four years in the trial court and that this appeal also remained pending for about a year or so and that lenient view may be taken.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.