KASTURI LAL THAPAR Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
LAWS(P&H)-1983-9-31
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on September 01,1983

Kasturi Lal Thapar Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

B.S.YADAV, J. - (1.) THIS judgment will dispose of the above criminal miscellaneous filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as well as Criminal Revision Nos. 547, 675, 676 and 677, all of 1983, as all of these arise out of the same case.
(2.) THE facts relating to these petitions are that Bachittar Singh respondent filed a complaint to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ludhiana, stating therein that he was the sole proprietor of Ankur Industries Thakkar Industrial Estate, Navghar Road, Bhayander East, District Thane, Maharashtra, while Kasturi Lal, present petitioner was his conductor in the said factory. He brought Kasturi Lal to Khanna in December 1979, to purchase some machinery from there for installing the same in the said factory. Some machinery was purchased at Khanna and handed over to Kasturi Lal and Dinesh Vaidya for taking it to Bhayander. After some time when Bachittar Singh respondent went to Bhayander he found that the said machinery had not been installed in the factory but had been dishonestly disposed of. On enquiry firstly Kasturi Lal and Dinesh Vaidya gave some evasive reply, but later on confessed that they dishonestly sold it to one Satyam Industries, Panchal Udyog Nagar, Bhayander. On the basis of the above report, F.I.R. No. 119 was registered in Police Station City, Khanna, on 12th July, 1980, under Sections 406 and 411. After investigating the case, the Police presented a charge sheet against the present petitioners Kasturi Kal, Dinesh Kumar Vaidya (petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 676 of 1983), Arun Kumar Vaidya petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 677 of 1983), R.S. Kanal and Mool Chand Hiranandani (petitioners in Criminal Revision No. 547 of 1983) and Ashtaq Ahmed, in the Court of judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Samrala. The learned magistrate vide order dated 18th February, 1983 framed various charges against the above accused. All these petitions have been filed for quashing the above charges.
(3.) BEFORE I proceed further, I may further make clear that one Ram Chand had filed Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4687-M of 1981 for quashing of the above F.I.R. No. 119 dated 12th July, 1980. That petition was dismissed by S.C. Mital J, on 9th November, 1981 on the ground that the matter was only at the stage of investigation by the police and the Court in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction could not interfere with the statutory power of the Police to investigate into the alleged offence and quash the proceedings.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.