JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Challenge is to the judgment dated 28.03.2012 passed by the
Additional Sessions Judge, Nuh, whereby accused-respondent Nos. 2 to 5
have been acquitted of the charges framed against them under Sections
306/34 IPC.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that on 13.10.2008 ASI Vijay Anand
received a VT message that Beena wife of Daya Chand was admitted in Om
Hospital, Palwal. Thereafter, he along with other police officials reached Om
Hospital, Palwal and obtained the MLR and rukka. Thereafter, the police
party was informed that Beena had expired and her dead body was lying in
General Hospital, Mandikhera. Thereafter, the said police party reached at
General Hospital, Mandikhera and recorded the statement of Nunat Ram to
the effect that he is having five children. His elder daughter namely Beena
was married to Daya Chand in the year 1997. Out of this wed-lock, five
children were born. The wife of her brother-in-law Ram Chand (respondent
No.5) was burnt to death. With regard to the said incident, a case was also
registered at Police Station Punhana. Aforesaid Ram Chand was again
married to Bhagwati daughter of Chote Lal, resident of Punhana. However,
Bhagwati also left him and since then, Ram Chand was having a suspicion
that Beena had instigated his wife to leave him. It was alleged that Ram
Chand, Amar Chand, Biro and Ramo-respondent Nos. 2 to 5 used to beat
Beena by levelling allegations against her. A Panchayat was also convened
in this regard. It was further alleged that his son-in-law Daya Chand and
daughter Beena were beaten by the aforesaid accused in Panchayat. On the
intervening night of 12.10.2008, his daughter-Beena had committed suicide
by consuming poison due to the harassment given to her by the accusedrespondents.
She was shifted to Om Hospital, from where she was referred to
Delhi. However, she died in the way. In this background, the FIR was
registered and challan under Section 306/34 IPC was presented against the
accused-respondent Nos. 2 to 5.
(3.) After presentation of the challan, charge under Section 306 read
with 34 IPC was framed against the accused, to which they pleaded not guilty
and claimed trial.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.