JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Crl. Misc. No. 21866 of 2013
Application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking exemption from
filing the certified copies of Annexures P-1 to P-4 and true typed copy of
Annexure P-3 is allowed, in view of the averments made in the application,
which are duly supported by an affidavit.
CRM-M No. 12408 of 2013
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.168 dated 2.4.2013 under Sections
420 and 120-B IPC registered at Police Station, Sector 34, Chandigarh.
(2.) The complainant Adarsh Gupta has alleged that the petitioners
have duped him for a sum of Rs. 1.70 crores on account of purchase of two
properties one is a plot in DLF, Mullanpur and another is regarding
purchase of House No.1095 Sector 15-B, Chandigarh. It is also mentioned
in FIR that cheques of Rs. 50 lacs, Rs. 35 lacs and Rs. 25 lacs were executed in
favour of the complainant, which have bounced and for which separate
proceedings are admittedly pending under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act. The benefit of anticipatory bail has been declined by the
Addl. Sessions Judge, Chandigarh vide order dated 9.4.2013 on account of
the fact that whether the documents are forged one's or not it is a matter of
evidence and the keeping in view the allegations which have been made in
the FIR.
(3.) The fact that the opportunity was given to pay the amount in
order to settle the issue which never materialised since the said cheques
were dishonoured prima facie shows that the petitioners have been
involved in the said offence.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.