JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) All the appeals are connected and relate to compensation
of property through a notification issued under Section 4 of the Land
Acquisition Act, on 07.5.1991. The properties acquired formed part
of a single block of lands in three villages Hamjheri (12 Acres, 0
Kanal and 04 Marlas), Haryaoo Khurd (123 Acres, 07 Kanals and 06
Marlas) and Deogarh (15 Acres, 03 Kanals and 16 Marlas). The
acquisition was for the purpose of construction of a Co-operative
Sugar Mill, Patran, proximate to the property already held by the Cooperative Sugar Mill.
(2.) The Land Acquisition Collector had awarded Rs.50,000/-
per acre for Chahi land for all the three villages and also awarded
compensation for tubewells. On a reference to the District Judge,
Patiala, for enhancement of compensation, the references have been
declined holding that the award of compensation made by the
learned Collector was itself fair and adequate.
(3.) The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
appellants referred to the documents, which has been relied upon for
compensation before the reference court. There were three types of
transactions on which the land owners relied on :-
(i) Private sales of properties, (ii) Intra departmental
communications between government officials for
recommending prices for acquisition of property for
Telecom Department and for grain market; and (iii) Award
for acquisition of land determining compensation for a
property that has acquired through a notification on
19.5.1992.
The State on its own had also relied on transactions of
sales Ex. R-4 to R-10.
;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.