JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Plaintiffs Prem Kaur etc. having been non-suited by both the
courts below have filed this second appeal. Plaintiffs are legal heirs of
Dial Singh being his widow, 3 sons and a daughter.
(2.) Case of the plaintiffs-appellants is that Dial Singh had
purchased 24 kanals 8 marlas land (Part-A land) and also purchased
24 kanals 86 marlas land (Part-B land) in open auction conducted by
Tehsildar Sales-defendant No.2 on 12.06.1963 on behalf of Rehabilitation
Department (defendant No.3) of Punjab State (defendant No.1). Dial Singh
paid sale money of both parts of the suit land. Mutation regarding Part-A
land was sanctioned in his favour and there is no dispute about the same.
(3.) However, mutation of Part-B land was not sanctioned because the said land
was not owned by defendants No.1 to 3 but was owned by some
other person.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.