JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The crux of the facts, which needs a necessary mention for the
limited purpose of deciding the core controversy, involved in the instant petition
and emanating from the record, is that the complainant M/s Modern Steels
Limited-respondent No.2 (for brevity "the complainant") filed a criminal
complaint (Annexure P10) against the petitioners M/s Auto Pins (India) Limited
and others, for the commission of offences punishable under Section 138 read with
Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter to be referred as "the
Act") and Sections 406 & 420 IPC, inter-alia pleading that a sum of Rs. 2 crores is
payable and due from the accused to the complainant. The accused, after checking
the account and to clear a part of balance of existing liability of the amount
payable by them to the complainant, issued a cheque, bearing No.195374
110015108 dated 7.8.2002 drawn on Canara Bank, Faridabad for an amount of
Rs. 3 lacs only. The cheque deposited by the complainant in the bank, was
dishonoured and received back with the endorsement of the Bank alongwith its
Memorandum dated 21.12.2002 with the remarks "Payment Stopped by Drawer"
of the cheque. The endorsement of Canara Bank was received by the complainant
through Punjab & Sind Bank, Chandigarh, with whom, the cheque was deposited
for encashment alongwith their memorandum dated 2.1.2003. Thereafter, the legal
notices were issued to the accused on their correct addresses through counsel as
well as through registered speed post with acknowledgment due and under postal
certificate (UPC), vide postal receipts dated 17.1.2003. The notices sent to
S.C.Khandewal (petitioner No.4) and accused R.P.Khurana were received back
with the remarks "refused" and other notices sent to the accused under registered
speed post and UPC were never received back.
(2.) Levelling a variety of allegations and narrating the sequence of
events, in all, according to the complainant that since the cheque issued by the
accused in discharge of their liability was dishonoured and even they did not make
the payment despite issuance of legal notices on their correct addresses, so, they
have committed the indicated offences in the manner described hereinbefore.
(3.) Taking cognizance of the offences and considering the preliminary,
oral as well as documentary evidence, in the shape of resolution (Ex.C-1), cheque
(Ex.C-2), memo (Ex.C-3), intimation (Ex.C-4), unclaimed envelopes (Ex.C-20 to
Ex.C-25) etc., the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate summoned the accused to face
trial under Section 138 of the Act, by virtue of summoning order dated 23.1.2004
(Annexure P12).;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.