JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This order shall dispose of LPA No.883 of 2012 titled as
Executive Engineer, Punjab State Electricity Board vs. Paul Singh JE (Retd)
and others, LPA No.884 of 2012 titled as Executive Engineer, Punjab State
Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Mulakh Raj and others, LPA No.885 of 2012
titled as Executive Engineer, Punjab State Electricity Board vs. Subhash
Chander Sharma and others & LPA No.886 of 2012 titled as Executive
Engineer, Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Sukhdev Dutt & Others
arising out of common order passed by the learned Single Judge of this
Court on 24.01.2012 whereby writ petitioners were found entitled to
promotional increments in terms of the Circular dated 23.04.1990.
(2.) Though before the learned Single Judge, it was admitted that
the petitioners fulfilled the criteria mentioned in the Circular but it was
argued that a decision of this Court rendered in second appeal cannot be
applied in a writ proceeding. The learned Single Judge found that since the
petitioners fulfilled the criteria mentioned in the Circular, therefore, the
petitioners are entitled to promotional increments.
(3.) Before this Court, learned counsel for the appellant relied upon
a Circular dated 17.3.2010 to contend that passing of a departmental
examination is a condition precedent for grant of promotional increment. It
is contended that since the writ petitioners have not qualified the
departmental examination, therefore, they are not entitled to promotional
increments. Reliance is also placed on a judgment in Bhakra Beas Management Board vs. Krishan Kumar Vij and another, 2010 8 SCC 701 to contend that the conditions as are specified in the Scheme for the
grant of increments are required to be satisfied before the promotional
increments are released to the employees.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.