JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR no. 446 dated 25.12.2010, under Sections 420/465/467/468/471/120B, registered at police station Tripuri Town, District Patiala.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala dismissing anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner.
(3.) This Court while issuing notice of motion on 31.05.2012 passed the following order:-
"CRM No.32524 of 2012 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRM No.M- 16212 of 2012 Contends that complainant and main accused are closely related and that they have already compromised the dispute vide Annexure P2. It is further submitted that though petitioner is an attesting witness of sale deed however, he attested the same on the asking of the main parties i.e. vendor and vendee. It is also contended that challan has already been filed against co-accused and petitioner was kept in column no.2 and however, now petitioner is sought to be arrested after about 1-1/2 years of the registration of the FIR. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Punjab for 26.07.2012
However, in the meantime, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case of his arrest, he shall be released on interim bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.