JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Concisely, the prosecution claimed that the petitioners-accused
executed an agreement to sell dated 13.07.2011 in favour of the complainantHarmeet Singh son of Kaka Singh(for brevity "the complainant") & his brother
and fraudulently received an amount of Rs.20 lacs as earnest money. They
intentionally did not execute the sale-deed on the agreed date i.e. on 28.12.2011.
On enquiry, it revealed that the petitioners-accused had already executed
agreement to sell dated 31.05.2011 in favour of Mohinder Singh and others, before
executing the agreement to sell in their(complainants) favour. It was claimed that
when the complainant asked them to execute the sale-deed in their favour, then the
petitioners-accused threatened them with dire consequences.
(2.) Levelling a variety of allegations and narrating the sequence of
events in all, the complainant claimed that the petitioners-accused have cheated
them and fraudulently received an amount of Rs.20 lacs as earnest money. In the
background of these allegations and in the wake of complaint of the complainant,
the present criminal case was registered against the petitioners-accused Kulwant
Singh and another, by means of FIR No.77 dated 23.06.2012, on accusation of
having committed the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 120-B IPC, by
the police of Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur.
(3.) Having exercised and lost their right before the Additional Sessions
Judge, now the petitioners-accused have preferred the present petition for the grant
of anticipatory bail in the above indicated case, invoking the provisions of Section
438 Cr.P.C.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.