JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of
Criminal Procedure (for short 'Cr. P. C. ') for quashing of order dated
19.09.2011, Annexure P4, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Ambala vide which, revision petition filed against order dated 20.05.2010,
Annexure P2, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambala
summoning petitioners-accused to face trial for offences under Sections
379/506/148 IPC read with Section 149 IPC alongwith co-accused already
facing trial, was dismissed.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and have gone
through the whole record including the impugned orders passed by learned
courts below.
(3.) It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that
already some litigation was pending between the parties and that the case was
duly investigated by the police and no case was found against the petitioners
and hence, their names were mentioned in column no. 2 in report under
Section 173 Cr. P. C. filed by the police. It is further submitted that the
learned courts below have committed illegality in summoning the petitionersaccused to face trial merely on the statement of PW Surjit Singh, Annexure
P5, which is reproduction of the statement already made by him before the
police.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.