JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The complainant Charat Singh has filed the present application
praying for grant of special leave to appeal against the judgement passed by
the trial Court acquitting all the five accused who faced the trial under
Sections 148, 436, 447 read with Section 149 IPC.
(2.) The brief case of the prosecution launched through
complainant Charat Singh is that accused Balbir Singh purchased land
measuring 1 kanal 10 marlas from Rajinder Singh. The said land was under
cultivation of the complainant Charat Singh. The complainant filed an
application for correction of khasra girdawari by scoring the name of
accused Balbir Singh. Accused Balbir Singh filed a civil suit for permanent
injunction as against the complainant and got an order of injunction
restraining the complainant from interfering with the peaceful possession of
accused Balbir Singh. The complainant preferred an appeal as against such
order of interim injunction granted by the Court. Accused Balbir Singh
lodged an FIR No.96 dated 17.9.2005 under Section 420 IPC as against the
complainant. After coming out on bail, the complainant filed a complaint
against Nachhattar Singh, a Constable posted at the residence of SSP,
Jalandhar. The other accused were closely related to accused Balbir Singh.
As the accused failed to get the possession of the land, they started nursing
grudge against the complainant. On 30.5.2005 at about 6.30 p.m., when the
complainant was watering his fields adjacent to the tubewell of accused
Balbir Singh, all the five accused were found present at the tubewell of
accused Balbir Singh. Accused Balbir Singh was armed with kirpan.
Accused Lakhwinder Singh and accused Ranjit Singh were armed with
dang. Accused Nachhattar Singh was armed with gandasi and accused
Girdawar Singh @ Gabi was armed with a double barrel gun. They were
seen by the complainant under the glow of an electric bulb at the tubewell of
Balbir Singh. On seeing the complainant, accused Balbir Singh raised a
lalkara that the complainant should not be permitted to go scot-free for not
delivering the possession of the land. The complainant ran towards his
tubewell room raising hue and cry. The accused who were armed with
weapons followed him. The complainant hid himself inside his tubewell
room by bolting the door from inside. On hearing the noise raised by the
complainant, PW2 Sucha Singh and PW3 Ranjit Singh came over there.
Accused Girdawar Singh fired two shots from his double barrel gun to scare
them, but PW2 and PW3 kept on standing at a distance and raised alarm.
Many villagers collected over there. All the accused set the shutter of the
tubewell of the complainant on fire by sprinkling kerosene oil which was
brought by them from their tubewell. The complainant kept on crying
inside the kotha. On seeing the collection of villagers, the accused left the
place of occurrence. The shutter of the door of the tubewell was partially
burnt. Thereafter, the complainant was rescued. He made an attempt to
lodge a complaint with SHO Police Station, Kartarpur. The SHO Police
Station, Kartarpur tore his complaint and threatened to implicate him in a
false case.
(3.) The accused have set up a plea in their statement under Section
313 Cr.P.C. that a false case was launched by the complainant as an order of
injunction was already obtained by accused Balbir Singh and two criminal
cases were also lodged as against the complainant at the instance of accused
Balbir Singh.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.