JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The civil writ petition has been filed by Baljit Singh
(petitioner) under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India
seeking quashing of the order dated 25.07.2002 (Annexure P-5)
passed by the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Thanesar (respondent
No.5) and the order dated 19.05.2004 (Annexure P-6) passed by the
Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala (respondent No.3) and for
directing the official respondents to maintain status quo in terms of
the order dated 09.06.1998 (Annexure P-3) passed by the learned
Financial Commissioner, Haryana (respondent No.2).
(2.) The petitioner-Baljit singh is the grandson of Jawahar
Singh. Manphool Singh (respondent No.6) is the son of Jawahar
Singh. According to the petitioner-Baljit Singh, he served in the
Indian Army for fifteen years and thereafter retired on
superannuation. There are 39 parties who are co-related through
their ancestors i.e. grand-father. They had common land before
partition. In the absence of the petitioner, it is alleged that all the 39
co-sharers of the joint land partitioned the land. Khasra No.1161 and
some portion of land from Khasra Nos.1156/2 and 1162/1 as per
'Naksha Bey' (Annexure P1) prepared by the revenue authorities
came to the share of Manphool Singh (respondent No.6). The said
land in the aforesaid Khasra numbers was being cultivated by
Manphool Singh (respondent No.6) and his ancestors for the last 40
years. Manphool Singh (respondent No.6) and other co-sharers
moved an application to the Tehsildar, Thanesar that the land which
was being cultivated by them should remain intact in the partition
proceedings. The Assitant Collector Ist Grade, Thanesar
(respondent No.5) vide order dated 27.01.1995 (Annexure P-2)
started division of land measuring 1312 kanals 6 marlas in village
Sudhpur, Tehsil Thanesar. It was inter alia recorded in the said order
(Annexure P-2) that the division of land would be made by keeping
the possession intact and if there was shortage, it would be removed
keeping in view the area. The petitioner was allotted 4 acres land,
which according to the petitioner was allotted in his absence and was
'kallar' land. He was allotted land comprised in Khasra Nos.1168,
1167, 1166 and 1162/2. Land in Khasra No.1161 was allotted to
Manphool Singh (respondent No.6). The petitioner-Baljit Singh was
satisfied with this partition and he had no grudge against any relative.
Thereafter Manphool Singh (respondent No.6) moved an application
to the Assistant Collector Grade II, Thanesar for handing over Killa
No.1161 which was also 'kallar' land with the petitioner. The
Assistant Collector Grade II decided the matter in favour of the
petitioner and ordered that status quo should be maintained.
Thereafter, Manphool Singh (respondent No.6), however, filed an
appeal before the District Collector, Kurukshetra (respondent No.4)
who set aside the order of the Assitant Collector Grade II. The
petitioner then filed a revision petition before the Commissioner,
Ambala Division, Ambala (respondent No.3) who also decided the
matter in favour of the petitioner. Manphool Singh (respondent No.6)
then filed a revision petition before the Financial Commissioner,
Haryana (respondent No.2) who after hearing the parties found no
merit in the objections filed by Manphool Singh (respondent No.6)
who was petitioner No.4 before the Financial Commissioner. It was,
however, ordered that the land in Khasra No.451 would not be for
Hukam Singh only but for all concerned co-sharers. Manphool Singh
(respondent No.6) along with others then filed CWP No.18570 of
1998 in this Court. This Court vide order dated 14.02.2002 observed
that the parties were at variance with regard to the sanctity of the site
plan produced by them. It was not possible to determine the matter
without knowing the factual position at the spot. The parties were
agreed that the matter be remitted to the Assistant Collector Ist
Grade, Thanesar (respondent No.5) who after examining the site
plan produced by the parties was to pass a fresh order. Accordingly,
all the impugned orders were quashed and the case was remitted to
the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Thanesar (respondent No.5) to
hear the parties and pass a fresh order.
(3.) The Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Thanesar (respondent
No.5) vide order dated 25.07.2002 (Annexure P-5) ordered that
changes be made qua Baljit Singh - petitioner on the northern side of
Khasra Nos.1161, 1162/1 and 1156/2 and Manphool Singh
(respondent No.6) be compensated from the Southern side of Khasra
No.1156 min and passage from Khasra Nos.1143/2/2 and 1355/2/2.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.