JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This application has been filed under Section 11(6) of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, the Act), seeking
appointment of an Arbitrator.
(2.) Vide contract agreement dated 11.6.2008 (P1), the petitioner
was appointed authorized Franchisee to do the marketing and distribution of
BSNL Telecom Service for its Brand name. Terms and conditions of the
work, to be executed, were enumerated in the agreement mentioned above.
Dispute arose between the parties. As per agreement Annexure P1, it is
provided that to settle a dispute, matter shall go to an Arbitrator named in
the contract agreement. The above provision reads thus:-
"30. Dispute Resolution/ Arbitration
Any question, dispute or differences arising out of or in
connection with this agreement or breach, termination or
validity hereof, shall be for its endeavored to be settled through
bipartite discussion or negotiation between the parties. If the
dispute cannot be amicably settled either party, as soon as
practicable, but not earlier than three months after a request to
settle the dispute amicably has been made to the other party,
give to the other party note in writing or existence of such
question, dispute or difference, specifying the nature and the
point at issue, and the same shall be finally settled by
Arbitration conducted in (Patiala) in accordance with the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 any modifications or
reenactments thereto and relevant laws and regulations in
force at that time in India. All such disputes and differences
which may arise between the parties hereto as to the meaning,
construction or effect of any of the terms and provisions of this
agreement or as to the right or claim of either party under this
agreement shall be referred to the sole arbitration of the Chief
General Manager Telecom, Punjab Circle Chandigarh or his
nominee including any office of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
(BSNL) nominated by him and the Franchisee shall not raise
any objection to such arbitration on the ground that the
arbitrator is an o icer of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
(BSNL) and as such is an interested party or that the Arbitrator
so appointed has earlier dealt with the subject matter of this
agreement. Any order/ Directions/ Awards of the Arbitrator
shall be final and binding on both the parties. The arbitration
proceedings shall take place in (Patiala) and will be governed
by the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation act 1996
or of any statutory amendment thereto or any reenactment
thereof for the time being in force. The Arbitrator so appointed
shall pass a speaking award. In case of any dispute the Patiala
Court alone shall have the territorial jurisdiction to adjudicate
upon the matter the agreement including the Annexures,
constitute the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to
the matters herein contained and supersedes all prior
agreements and understandings between the parties whether
written or oral. The agreement shall be signed by the
authorized representatives of both parties. For the purpose
hereof the "authorized representatives" of the BSNL (Bharat
Sanchar Nigam Limited) and the Franchisee shall include only
those persons listed in Annexure G hereof, their successors and
such persons as may be designated in writing by the BSNL or
Franchisee."
(3.) As per agreement between the parties, the Chief General
Manager Telecom, Punjab Circle Chandigarh was to act as an Arbitrator.
When after issuance of a notice dated 21.11.2011 invoking the arbitration
clause nothing was done, the petitioner came to this Court by filing the
present petition.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.