JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Rupinder Singh, appellant has brought this appeal against the
judgment dated 06.01.2003 of his conviction for an offence punishable
under section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
( for short 'the Act') passed by learned Judge, Special Court, Patiala and the
order on sentence of the same date vide which he has been ordered to
undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a fine of
Rs.1,00,000/- with further rigorous imprisonment for six months in default of
payment of fine. The case registered by Police Station Samana against the
appellant by way of FIR No.513 dated 23.11.1999 is as under:-
On 23.11.1999 at about 9.30 PM Rajesh Kumar, Sub Inspector
alongwith Head Constable Bhupinder Singh and some other police officials
was present at Bhawanigarh Chowk Samana in connection with nakabandi.
There he received a secret information to the effect that Rupinder Singh
alias Rupa son of Joginder Singh, resident of Malkana Patti Majri Samana is
in the habit of keeping and selling poppy husk and that if raid was
conducted, then poppy husk in heavy quantity could be recovered. Finding
the information to be reliable, Rajesh Kumar, SI had sent a ruqa to the
police station for registration of the case and before starting for the place
where the appellant was said to be available with poppy husk, he had sent
information to DSP Gursharan Singh Bedi by way of wireless message to
reach the spot, being a Gazetted Officer. On the writing received from
Rajesh Kumar, SI, a case was registered at the police station by Darshan
Singh, ASI. Rajesh Kumar, SI reached Malkana Patti Majri Samana. In the
light of the vehicle, Rajesh Kumar SI was riding, he saw a man sitting on
two bags. Rupinder Singh was apprehended and on inquiry he told his name
as Rupinder Singh. Rajesh Kumar, SI told him that he suspected poppy
husk in the bags he was sitting on and that he intended to conduct search of
the same. The accused was given the option of search of the bags in the
presence of some Gazetted Officer or Magistrate. The accused exercised
the option for search in the presence of a Gazetted Officer. The option
given to the appellant was reduced to writing, which was signed by the
accused and attested by the witnesses. In the meanwhile, DSP Gursharan
Singh Bedi reached the spot. He disclosed his identity to the accused and
told him that he was a Gazetted Officer. The accused was, however, given
the option of his search by him or by a Magistrate. The accused had
expressed confidence in the DSP for his search. Memo of this option was
also prepared, which was signed by the accused and attested by the
witnesses. In the presence of the DSP, Rajesh Kumar, SI conducted the
search of the bags, which were found to contain poppy husk. Two samples
from each bag weighing 250 grams were taken out from the two bags. They
were converted into separate parcels. The remaining poppy husk was found
to be 34 kg. 500 grams in each bag. The bags were also given the shape of
parcels and they were sealed by Rajesh Kumar, SI with his seal bearing
impression 'RK'. The DSP had also affixed his seal 'GS' thereon. Seal after
use was handed over by Rajesh Kumar, SI to HC Bhupinder Singh while
the DSP retained the seal with him. The sealed parcels were then taken into
possession by way of recovery memo. A rough site plan of the place of
recovery was prepared by Rajesh Kumar, SI. He recorded the statements of
the witnesses under section 161 Cr.P.C. and arrested the accused. In the
meanwhile, special report of the case was sent from the police station to the
Illaqa Magistrate through Sukchain Singh, Constable. Rajesh Kumar, SI
produced the case property and the accused before SI Manjit Singh, SHO
after reaching the police station, who had verified the investigation and had
put his seal bearing impression 'MS' on the case property. Rajesh Kumar, SI
then deposited the case property with the MHC and the accused was put in
the lock up.
(2.) On 24.11.1999 Bhupinder Singh, HC alongwith other police
officials produced the accused before learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class,
Samana, who had made his endorsement on the application and Bhupinder
Singh, HC had re-deposited the case property with the MHC with seals
intact. On receipt of the report of chemical examiner to the effect that the
samples were of crushed poppy heads and on completion of other
formalities of investigation, challan against the appellant was prepared and
presented in the court.
(3.) Finding a prima-facie case against the appellant, learned Judge,
Special Court, Patiala vide his order dated 15.03.2000 charged him for an
offence punishable under section 15 of the Act. To the charge so framed
against him, he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.