JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The Crl. Misc. application No.293-MA of 2012 has been
filed seeking grant of leave to appeal against the acquittal of respondents No.1
to 3 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamunanagar at Jagadhri in
terms of his judgment and order dated 12.12.2011. Along with the application
for grant of leave to appeal, CRM No.28158 of 2012 has been filed seeking
condonation of 47 days' delay in filing the application for grant of leave to
appeal.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant-State.
(2.) The facts of the case are that Shyam Lal ASI (PW10) on
26.2.2010 received secret information that some persons were transporting
cattle (cows and oxen) in a TATA 207 vehicle bearing registration No. HR 58-
7791 from State of Haryana and taking them for slaughtering in the State of
Uttar Pradesh. One Khalid (respondent No.2) was driving the vehicle. The
information was found reliable and a police picket was set up. After sometime
the aforesaid vehicle as had been disclosed by the secret informer was seen
coming and it was signalled to stop. The driver of the vehicle i.e. TATA 207,
however, accelerated the same and tried to run over the police officials. They
saved themselves by getting towards the side of the road. The TATA 207
vehicle crossed the police picket after striking against the barricade that had
been set up. Three tyres of the vehicle got punctured and the same overturned.
(3.) The persons who were travelling in the TATA 207 vehicle, however, managed
to flee away. From the vehicle, two cows and three oxen were recovered. One
of the two cows was dead. The TATA 207 vehicle and the cattle were taken in
possession by the police. A written memo (Ruqa) was sent by ASI Shyam Lal
(PW10) through Constable Gurpeet Singh to the Police Station. On the basis
of the same, a case (FIR) was registered for the offences under Sections 307
and 429 Indian Penal Code ("IPC" - for short), besides, Section 4-B read with
Section 8 of the Punjab Prohibition of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Section
11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 at Police Station
Bilaspur. The respondents were arrested. However, one of the accused
namely Nawab was not arrested and was declared a proclaimed offender in
terms of the order dated 20.10.2010 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate
Ist Class, Yamunanagar. Charges were framed against the accused. The case
was committed by the learned Ilaqa Magistrate to the Court of Sessions. The
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamunanagar at Jagadhri to whom the case
was assigned charge-sheeted the respondents for the offence under Section
Section 4-B read with Section 8 of the Punjab Prohibition of Cow Slaughter
Act, 1955 and Section 11 of the Prevention to Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960,
besides, Sections 429 and 307 IPC. The prosecution in order to prove its case
examined 13 witnesses, besides, tendered documents in evidence. The
incriminating evidence appearing against the respondents was put to them and
their statements in terms of Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
("CrPC" - for short) were recorded. The respondents pleaded innocence and
claimed that they had been falsely implicated. They led no evidence in
defence. The learned trial Court after considering the evidence and material on
record, has acquitted the respondents. Aggrieved against the same, the
applicant-State has filed the present application for grant of leave to appeal
along with an application for condonation of 47 days' delay in filing the
application for grant of leave to appeal.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.