JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Both the petitioners are present in the Court and are identified by their
counsel.
(2.) The petitioners seek protection to their life and liberty. They have filed
the instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for
short 'Cr.P.C.') alleging that they being of marriageable age, got married with each
other. The petitioners claim that their marriage is legal. The private respondents are
not accepting the marriage of the petitioners alleging it to be against the social
norms. The petitioners tried to persuade their parents and relatives but remained
unsuccessful in their endeavour. The private respondents, it is alleged, are hell-bent
to separate the petitioners from each other by resorting to illegal means. Thus, it has
been pleaded that the petitioners are apprehending imminent danger to their life and
liberty from the private respondents. Having been left with no other option, it has
become the compulsive necessity for the petitioners to approach this Court.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that both the petitioners are
major in terms of the documents appended as Annexures P-1, P-2 and P-3. They
have married each other of their own free will. The photographs of the marriage are
appended as Annexure P-4. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that
despite the representation dated 1.9.2012 (Annexure P-5), having been duly
submitted to the S.H.O. Police Station Tarori, Distt. Karnal-respondent No.3, no
action is being taken thereon and the petitioners are apprehending danger to their life
and liberty at the hands of private respondents.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.