JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Vide this order, the above mentioned two petitions would
be disposed of as in both the petitions, the petitioners have sought
quashing of FIR No.70 dated 30.6.2008 under Section 406/ 498-A/
34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short) and Sections 3 and
4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (the Act for short) registered at
Police Station Khammano Kalan, District Fatehgarh Sahib and all the
subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
FIR, as reproduced in the petition, reads as under:-
"My name is Sukhvinder Kaur. I am resident of Ward No.
7, Khamano, Distt. Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab.
That my daughter named Jaspreet Kaur was married to
Kulvinder Singh Mangat with Sikh marriage rites
(Anandkarj) on 25.11.2003 at JIFE Resorts Sahnewal,
Punjab. Being only daughter, I spent huge money on her
marriage. About 600 persons attended this wedding.
About Rs. 16 lacs were spent on her marriage including
catering. A Maruti Zen Car bearing registration No. PB-
49-7511 as demanded, 105 Tola Golden jewelry, clothes,
two lacs cash etc, as Ishtridhan. About two weeks they
resided as husband and wife in Khanna and on 5th
December, 2003 they went to Hong Kong. About 9
months they lived happily and after that Charanjit Kaur
(mother in law) started teasing my daughter for bringing
less dowry and also told to my daughter that Charanjit
Kaur has spent huge amount of money on marriage of her
daughter Sukhvinder Kaur and my daughter should bring
more dowry to live happily and want to settle in Hong
Kong. As they were constructing house in Mohali so they
need money for its constructions. Kulvinder Singh
(Husband) and Lakhvir Singh (Father in law) also followed
foot steps of Charanjit Kaur for bringing more money. For
some time my daughter remained silent but they
continuously started pressurizing her. In the month of
January 2005 my daughter came to India. She shared
her feeling with me regarding their demand of money.
When I came to know this matter, I gave a phone call to
Charanjit Kaur (mother in law). She talked with me in a
rude manner and demanded 15 lacs Rupees. She
threatened me that if I do not fulfill her demands, she will
re-marry her son. She also told me to arrange this huge
amount of money till month of March/April as she was
coming to India during this period for the heart treatment
of her mother (Surjit Kaur) and also for performing Greh
Parvesh Ceremony of house in Mohali. I withdraw 3 lacs
from account No. 18562 and two lacs from account no.
19421 from on 24.3.2005, 50,000 from account of 18562
and 50,000 from account no. 19421 on 7.4.2005. All from
Punjab and Sind Bank, Khamano. On 19.4.2005 I
alongwith my son my husband and my brother went to
Mohali and gave 6.0 lacs to Charanjit Kaur. When she
came to know that we have brought only Rs. 6.0 lacs she
got angry and behaved very rudely with us. She again
threatened me that I do not give her rent of money she
will not take my daughter back to Hong Kong and also
she threatened me that she will re-marriage of her son.
Then we requested to her to give us time for arranging
money and we also requested her not to leave my
daughter and take her back to Hong Kong. Then my
daughter went back to Hong Kong. Charanjit Kaur has
joint account with my daughter and withdraws salaried
money of my daughter without her consent for her
personal use. Charanjit Kuar, Lakhvir Sing and Kulvinder
Singh regularly teased and taunted my daughter to get
the remaining money. In the mean time my daughter get
pregnant and on 10th April, 2006 my daughter gave birth
to a female child. As no male child was born, her
husband (Kulvinder singh and Charanjit kaur) started
teasing her. On 15.5.2006, Kulvinder Singh gave her
beatings in the presence of Charanjit Kaur and Lakhbir
Singh and threatened her that they will not extend her
Visa and also to give her divorce if they do not give them
money. My daughter showed inability to bring that huge
amount of money as huge money has been spent on her
marriage and thereafter. Charanjit Kaur and Lakhvinder
Singh started treating my daughter like servants. I talked
on phone to Charanjit Kaur regarding their demand of
huge money for extension of my daugher's Visa. Again
Charanjit Kaur threatened me for re-marriage of their son.
If they do not give them remaining amount and they will
send my daughter to India. I assured my inability to give
such a huge amount of money but I assured Charanjit
kaur that I can arrange some money. On 12.6.2007, I
borrowed 2.0 lacs from Surjit Singh son of Harcharn
Singh resident of Ward No. 3, khamano District Fatehgarh
Sahib Punjab and on the direction of Charanjit Kaur I
gave these 2.0 lacs Rupees to Surjit Kaur (Mother of
Charanjit Kaur) at her residence in Mohali. After receiving
the money they start demanding the rest of the money
soon because the date of expiry of daughter Visa was
coming near in the month of October 2007. Charanjit
Kaur was in India and started demanding remaining
money. I assured my inability to arrange such amount of
money as my husband was ill and are not able to fulfill the
demand of money. When they came to know that they will
not get any money from us, Kulvinder Singh got furious
and beat my daughter and told my daughter that he is not
going to extend her Visa and asked my daughter to return
to India. After all the happenings my daughter somehow
managed to get employment visa on the basis of her job
as a Teacher in School on knowing to her husband that
she has procured employment visa he furious and gave
her beating and threatened to ruin my daughter's life and
also he disclosed my daughter that he had an affair with
Chinese girl and wanted to marry her. After that Kulvinder
Singh started living separately from my daughter at Flat
E, Block 137 Floor See View, Crescent, Tung Chung,
New Territories, Hong Kong. So my daughter is in great
difficulty because of these demands of dowry, maltreatment and harassment. Therefore, legal action may
kindly be taken against the accused and justice be done
to me. I will be thankful to you."
(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that
Jaspreet Kaur, daughter of the complainant, was married to Kulvinder
Singh on 25.11.2003 at Sahnewal. Thereafter, the couple left for
Hong Kong on 5.12.2003. The matrimonial relations between them
became strained. Divorce petition was filed by petitioner Kulvinder
Singh. Jaspreet Kaur gave her consent for grant of decree of divorce
and consequently, the decree of divorce was granted. The couple
had also settled their dispute qua the custody of the child. Jaspreet
Kaur was residing in Hong Kong. Petitioner Surjit Kaur was about 90
years old and was maternal grand mother of Kulvinder Singh. The
petitioners had been falsely involved in this case.
(3.) Learned counsel for respondent No.2, on the other hand,
has submitted that all the petitioners were guilty of harassing the
daughter of the complainant on account of insufficiency of dowry.
Hence, the criminal proceedings were liable to continue.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.