JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioners in the present case had approached this court by
filing CWP No. 23258 of 2010 Chain Pal and others vs State of Haryana
and others seeking a direction to the respondent not to continue with the
consolidation proceedings in pursuance to the notification dated 5.3.1990
issued by the State of Haryana regarding consolidation of 856 acres of
Shamlat Deh land till the revenue record pertaining to the said land is
prepared in accordance with law and further keeping in view the reports
submitted by the Deputy Commissioner, Panipat vide letters dated
31.1.2003, 11.7.2007, 26.11.2007 and 13.3.2008.
(2.) From the very beginning, the Deputy Commissioner, Panipat,
had been apprising the Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary,
Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Haryana, that from
various mutations entered in the revenue records, it is evident that some
influential persons and the Land Mafia, in order to grab the land in collusion
with the staff of the Consolidation Department, had got mutations entered
wrongly. In the first letter dated 31.1.2003, a request was made by the
Deputy Commissioner to the Financial Commissioner that the investigation
is required to be got done through State Vigilance Bureau, Haryana. In the
subsequent communication, on the basis of an enquiry conducted by Sub-
Divisional Officer, Smalkha, Raj Kumar Bhoria, Tehsildar-cum
Consolidation Officer, Samalkha and Kitab Singh, Assistant Consolidation
Officer, Karnal, were prima facie found to be guilty. The departmental
action against them was suggested.
(3.) This court had disposed of the aforesaid writ petition vide order
dated 17.8.2011, while recording the statement made by learned Deputy
Advocate General appearing for the State and directed that the decision be
taken on the communications, Annexures P-2, and P-6 to P-8 by the Deputy
Commissioner within a period of 90 days from the date certified copy of the
order is placed before respondent no. 2, namely, the Director Consolidation,
Haryana. The relevant part of the order is extracted below:-
"Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate
General, Punjab, has fairly stated that without relevant
revenue record, consolidation proceedings should not
be initiated. He further states that Director,
Consolidation, shall take into consideration opinion of
the Deputy Commissioner within 90 days.
Without expressing any opinion on the merit of
the case, respondent No. 2 is directed to take decision
on Annexures P/2, P/6 to P/8, submitted by Deputy
Commissioner, Panipat, within 90 days from the date
certified copy of this order is placed before him.
Meanwhile, further consolidation proceedings in the
village shall remain in abeyance.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.