JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Petitioner/appellant is in second appeal against the
judgments passed by the courts below whereby his petition under
Section 10 of the Provincial Insolvency Act,1920 (for short the 1920
Act) was dismissed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division)-cumInsolvency Judge,Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhari, and in first appeal the
findings of the Insolvency Judge were upheld.
(2.) Briefly noticed, appellant, a partner in M/s Kartik Udyog in
order to run the business of the Firm raised loan from Haryana
Financial Corporation and Punjab National Bank. The firm is said to
have went in losses. Since the loan obtained from the said financial
institutions was not repaid, the land, building and machinery were
taken into possession by respondent no.1-Haryana Financial
Corporation and disposed of by way of sale in an open auction. Since
respondent no.1-Corporation and respondent no.2-Bank were
pressurizing the appellant to repay the remaining loan of
Rs.31,00,000/- and Rs.4,00,000/- respectively, he filed a petition under
Section 10 of the 1920 Act, alleging therein that appellant was left with
no moveable/ immovable property and was earning Rs.3000/- per
month by working as small time Commission Agent. In these
circumstances, prayer was made for declaring him an insolvent.
Upon notice, respondent no.1-Corporation took
preliminary objection that it was a body corporate under the provisions
of the State Financial Corporation Act and as such provisions of 1920
Act were not applicable to it. Respondent no.2-Bank filed written
statement stating therein that there was relationship of borrower and
creditor between the parties and since the appellant/petitioner failed to
pay the amount the bank effected the recovery under Securitization Act.
On the pleadings of the parties, issues were framed. Both
sides led evidence in support of their respective pleas. The learned trial
court after hearing both sides and perusing the oral/documentary
evidence on record, dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner for
declaring him as insolvent. In the first appeal, filed by the appellant, the
findings of the trial court were upheld. Hence the present second
appeal.
(3.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
paper book.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.