JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Surender Kumar Sharma, the petitioner has brought this
petition under the provisions of section 482 Cr. P. C. for setting aside the
order dated 6.9.2012 (Annexure P5) passed by learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Faridabad and the order dated 31.5.2012 (Annexure
P4) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Faridabad being
illegal and void.
(2.) In a prosecution brought by Rajesh Dagar, the respondent
against the petitioner for an offence punishable under sections 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, "the Act), the petitioner has
made an application for allowing the original cheque for expert opinion
and accept the manuscript of the accused/applicant for comparing the
same with the writing of the cheque. He has claimed that he did not fill
the blanks of the cheque as is claimed by the complainant as also by
Virender Dagar, CW-2. According to him, the complainant and Virender
Dagar have falsely stated that the accused filled the cheque himself.
(3.) According to him, the dispute between the parties is, therefore, on the
question as to whether the accused had filled the complainant's name
and amount in figures and words with date in the cheque. He has further
submitted that he wanted to bring to the notice of the court the true facts
and for that purpose expert opinion of handwriting/manuscript expert was
required. Hence, he has prayed that a handwriting expert may be
appointed for the said purpose.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.