JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Tersely, the facts and material, which need a necessary
mention for the limited purpose of deciding the instant revision petition
and emanating from the record, are that in the wake of complaint of
complainant-married victim (name withheld), a criminal case was
registered against the petitioner-convict for outraging her modesty, vide
FIR No.1633 dated 10.9.1997, on accusation of having committed the
offences punishable under sections 354, 451 and 457 IPC by the police of
Police Station Sadar, Gurgaon.
(2.) Having completed all the codal formalities and taking into
consideration the oral as well as documentary evidence brought on record
by the prosecution, the trial Court convicted & sentenced the petitionerconvict to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for the
commission of offence punishable under section 354 IPC, to undergo RI
for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- under section 451
IPC, by way of impugned judgment of conviction dated 20.8.2004 and
order of sentence dated 21.8.2004.
(3.) Aggrieved by the impugned judgment of conviction and
order of sentence, the petitioner-convict filed the appeal. However, the
appellate Court affirmed the judgment of conviction and reduced the
sentence of imprisonment of one year to six months, to pay a fine of
Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple
imprisonment for a period of one month under section 354 IPC. To
undergo RI for a period of four months instead of six months, to pay a
fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further
simple imprisonment for a period of one month under section 451 IPC, by
means of impugned judgment dated 2.9.2006.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.