JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioners pray for grant of compensation on account of loss of
their son aged 8 years due to electrocution on 8.10.2009. The deceased who was
earning his livelihood by picking up waste material and thereafter selling the same
and also doing menial labour work, died when he came into touch with the barbed
wire which was touching the hanging electric wire from the pole.
(2.) The respondents have denied their liability and have stated that no
notice was served upon them regarding the accident in terms of Section 161 of the
Indian Electricity Act, 2003 and Rule 44-A of the Electricity Rules, 1956.
However, they have admitted that the earth wire of the 11 KV Mithapur Feeder
had broken and fallen down on the barbed wire and was in contact with it and as
the victim tried to pass over the barbed wire, he came into contact with the electric
current. It has been admitted that the accident had occurred due to the poor
maintenance of 11 KV Line and in the investigation by the office of the Chief
Electrical Inspector, the Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. was held
responsible for infringement of Rule 29 of the Indian Electricity Rules, 1956
which obligates the Nigam to adhere to the guidelines providing for maintenance.
In view of the aforesaid, when the factum of negligence of
maintenance of 11 KV Feeder wire has been more or less admitted by the
respondents, I am of the opinion that the principle of res ipso locutor is attracted
to the facts of the case, as it is evident that the element of negligence is directly
attributable to the respondents.
(3.) The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Delhi v. Association of Victims of Uphar Tragedy and others,2012 3 RAJ 92 has held that the Constitutional Court while exercising
its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is certainly empowered to
invoke its jurisdiction to answer the claim of compensation and it is not necessary
to force the litigant into the throes of long litigation before the civil courts and also
to evolve its own methodology to assess compensation.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.