JUDGEMENT
A.K.SIKRI, J. -
(1.) THE petitioner wants this court to issue a writ of
mandamus thereby directing the respondents to take appropriate
measures to tackle the rising stray dog menace in the States of
Punjab, Haryana as well as Union Territory of Chandigarh. The
petitioner had also earlier approached this Court by way of CWP
No.3653 of 2012, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for the
same relief in which orders dated 27.2.2012 were passed observing
that the municipal authorities would take all necessary steps to control
this menace. The grievance of the petitioner, however, is that after
the said order and despite representation made by him, no steps are
taken by the respondent-authorities which has forced him to file
present petition, again as PIL. As per the petitioner, provisions of
Section 11(3)(b) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960
(hereinafter to be referred to "PCA Act") are available to the
respondents to take effective steps and action to tackle the menace.
(2.) THE petitioner is a former Municipal Councillor, Mohali (Punjab) and claims himself to be a public-spirited person. He claims that he has
taken various issues relating to the welfare of the public of Mohali at
various foras including this High Court for their logical redressal and
had earlier also filed writ petitions pertaining to enhancement of water
supply capacity to Mohali. In the present petition, he has highlighted
that in the recent past, it has been seen that stray dogs in the States
of Punjab, Haryana and also Union Territory of Chandigarh have
created a terror and are endangering human lives of all age groups
resulting into injuries/deaths of innocent people who fall prey to these
stray dogs. Some of the news items, depicting the fright/terror created
by the stray dogs, are attached with the petition. News-item appearing
in the Hindustan Times dated 4.2.2012 (P-1), inter alia, reports the
menace and the helplessness on the part of the State of Punjab to
tackle the same. This report indicates that State of Punjab has no
funds to arrange for the sterilisation of the dogs across the State and
killing could be an alternative. However, the Government is at a loss as
to under what provisions these stray dogs can be killed.
In the news item which appeared in The Tribune dated 11.2.2012 (P-2), it is mentioned that at least 10 dog bite cases are reported from Doaba cities daily. However, the authorities have no
effective plans in place to check the menace. Worse still, Jalandhar,
Hoshiarpur, Nakodar and other Government hospitals in the Doaba belt
have no stock of the anti-rabies vaccine and patients are forced to turn
to private suppliers. It is also stated that civil authorities in these cities
have failed to find a solution to the stray dog menace, which is getting
beyond their control. Moreover, nobody wants to touch them for fear
of animal rights organisations. About Jalandhar, in particular, it is
stated that there is hardly any locality in the city which has remained
unaffected by stray dogs. The city has even more than 3000 such
dogs.
(3.) ON issuing notice of motion, States of Punjab and Haryana have filed their affidavits. Affidavits are also filed by the Municipal
Corporations of Mohali, Panchkula and Chandigarh. Director, Health
Services (Training), O/o Director General Health Services, Haryana,
has also filed affidavit indicating the action taken. Respondent No.5,
namely, Directorate, Animal Husbandry & Dairying Department,
Haryana, has filed separate written statement.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.