JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present application bearing No. CRM-A 131 MA of
2012 has been filed for grant of leave to file appeal against the
judgment dated 05.10.2011 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist
Class, Faridabad, whereby in a complaint case, the respondentsaccused were acquitted.
Along with the present application,Criminal Miscellaneous
No. 9290 of 2012 has also been filed for condonation of delay of 30
days in filing the main application.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that the applicant-Mittar Kumar
was a transporter. He purchased vehicle bearing registration No. HR-
38F-8609 on hire purchase basis, financed by M/s. Shri Ram
Investments Ltd. The applicant-complainant issued cheques against
the scheme of instalments to the finance company. The
respondents-accused allegedly induced the applicant-complainant to
sell the vehicle in favour of Gian Chander-respondent No.2.
(3.) R.K.Sachdeva was the creditor of the applicant-complainant while
V.P.Kheterpal-respondent No.3 was running the business of delivery
of the vehicle. The applicant sold the vehicle to Gian Chanderrespondent No.2 with the condition that he would regularly pay the
instalments to the above said finance company from which the
vehicle in question was purchased under the hypothecation
agreement. Gian Chander-respondent No.2 had admitted that he
would pay 27 instalments of Rs. 800/-each per month to the finance
company and, thereafter, the vehicle was transferred in favour of
Gian Chander-respondent No. 2 on instructions and directions of
R.K.Sachdeva. The said transaction was arranged by V.P.Kheterpalrespondent No.3. The accused persons had deliberately not paid
the instalments to the finance company and thereby cheated the
complainant, therefore, the complainant filed the complaint against
R.K.Sachdeva, Gian Chander and V.P.Kheterpal for the commission
of offence punishable under Section 420, IPC.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.