JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed for
setting aside the judgment of acquittal dated 16.11.2011
passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Saheed
Bhagat Singh Nagar, whereby the appeal filed by
respondent Ramjit Singh was accepted.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that respondent Ramjit
Singh along with Parkash Kaur were summoned to face trial
for the offence punishable under Section 420, IPC vide order
dated 27.07.2006 on the complaint of petitioner Joginder
Singh. It was alleged in the complaint that Ramjit Singh
and Parkash Kaur were husband and wife and they owned a
house and other property in village Hiyatpur Rurki. They
also owned a scooter and were leading a comfortable life.
(3.) They further purchased some land in village Hiyatpur Rurki
worth Rs. 6,00,000/-. The date of birth of Ramjit Singh was
01.04.1948 and Parkash Kaur was also of the same age and
as such were not entitled for the old age pension. It was
further alleged that they had changed dates of birth and
suppressed the material facts to get the old-age pension
and as such committed the offences punishable under
Sections 420, 468 and 471, IPC. In that regard, Joginder
Singh filed a complaint before the then Deputy
Commissioner on 22.10.2003 along with an affidavit and
again filed one more complaint on 26.05.2004 to the effect
that accused were receiving pension in illegal manner, but
no action was taken. Seeing no other alternative, the
complainant filed the complaint before the learned Area
Magistrate.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.