JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This Criminal revision petition has been filed by Gurnam
Singh, complainant, challenging the judgment dated 18.12.2001
passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Rajpura whereby
respondents No. 4 to 6 were acquitted of all the charges framed
against them for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 326,
148,149, IPC.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that on 15.06.1993, on receipt
of Medico Legal Report of one Gurnam Singh, ASI Surjit Singh went
to Rajindera Hospital, Patiala, and after obtaining the opinion from
the doctor, recorded statement of Gurnam Singh to the effect that he
was resident of village Dera Alimajra and was an agriculturist. On
14.06.1993, his father, Hardial Singh, came to the house after
attending court proceedings of a case pending in the Civil Courts at
Rajpura with regard to some agricultural land. At about 6.00 P.M.,
Gurnam Singh along with his father Hardial Singh, his brother Amrik
Singh, Raman Singh, Jarnail Singh, Jora Singh, Piara Singh son of
Ajmer Singh and Chaten Singh went to the house of Balbir Singh to
stop him from cutting sun-flowers (Suraj Mukhi) crop from the land in
dispute. Jaggar Singh son of Bachan Singh asked as to how they
dared to come there and, thereafter, Kesar Singh inflicted a gandasi
blow on left side of his head; Rajinder Singh and Manga Singh who
were working in the fields reached at the spot. Jaggar Singh gave a
gandasi blow on the left side of his hand. Manga Singh inflicted a
gandasi blow on his head. Amrik Singh, Harnek Singh,Jarnail Singh,
Jora Singh, Piara Singh, Chaten Singh and his father rescued him
from the clutches of the accused otherwise they would have killed
him. The injuries were also caused to Kesar Singh, Jaggar Singh,
Harjit Kaur, Balbir Singh, Jaggar Singh son of Bachan Singh in their
defence. The accused ran away from the spot with their respective
weapons. The motive for inflicting injuries was the land in dispute.
'Suraj Mukhi' was sown in the land in dispute and Balbir Singh and
others wanted to forcibly cut the same. Bagh Singh took the injured
Gurnam Singh to Government Hospital, Rajpura from-where he was
referred to Rajindera Hospital, Patiala. FIR was registered. After
completion of investigation, report under Section 173, Cr.P.C. was
presented and the accused were charge sheeted for the offences
punishable under Sections 324, 326, 148, 149, IPC.
(3.) In order to substantiate its allegations, the prosecution
examined Gurdial Singh as PW1; Chaten Singh as PW2;
Dr.I.C.Taneja as PW3; ASI Surjit Singh as PW4 and, thereafter, the
prosecution evidence was closed by order of the court.
Statements of the accused in terms of Section 313,
Cr.P.C. were recorded in which they claimed themselves to be
innocent. However, they had tendered certified copy of judgment
dated 27.04.2001 in civil suit No. 317 dated 25.04.1994 as Ex.D1
and its decree sheet as Ex.D2.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.