JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Rupinder Kaur who is petitioner before the trial court has
filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
assailing Order dated 19.12.2011 (Annexure P-4), passed by learned
Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Moga (exercising power of
District Judge as Guardian judge) thereby allowing application
(Annexure P-2) moved by Binder Singh respondent No. 1 herein
under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil
Procedure for impleading him as party to the petition which has been
instituted by petitioner Rupinder Kaur against the general public
under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956
read with Section 29 of the Guardian of Wards Act for permission to
sell the land of her minor daughters
Tamrin Kaur and Balrin Kaur. Respondent No. 1 herein is paternal
uncle of the minors.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the case file.
(3.) Counsel for the petitioner contended that respondent No.
1 is in illegal possession of the land belonging to the minors and is
not paying anything to them and therefore, he has no right to contest
the petition filed by the petitioner. On the other hand, counsel for
respondent No. 1 contended that petitioner has performed second
marriage and she would utilise the sale consideration of the land of
the minors for herself, thereby adversely affecting the interest of the
minors.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.