JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) While filing the suit, the appellant sought declaration
that the judgment and decree dated 7.11.1983 passed in civil suit
No. 33-T of 9.11.1971/1982 and confirmed by the lower appellate
Court was not binding upon it and the defendants had no right to
get possession of the land in dispute in execution of the said
decree. According to the appellant, the decree under challenge
had been obtained by fraud and after concealing the facts from
the Court.
(2.) The suit was opposed by the respondents on the
ground that the earlier suit filed by Bhagwant Singh, their
predecessor-in-interest, was decreed on 7.11.1983 against the
State of Punjab wherein it was held that the State of Punjab had
nothing to do with the suit land. That litigation went upto the
Hon'ble Supreme Court but the State of Punjab remained
unsuccessful. Since that suit had been filed in the year 1971, the
lease deed executed by the State of Punjab in favour of the
appellant-plaintiff in the year 1972 was hit by the doctrine of lispendens.
Vide judgment dated 29.1.2007, the trial Court
dismissed the present suit filed by the appellant. Aggrieved of the
same, the appellant filed an appeal, which was, however,
dismissed by the lower appellate Court on 16.4.2012. Hence, the
present second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure.
(3.) The only ground taken by the learned counsel for the
appellant is that in the previous suit filed by Bhagwant Singh on
9.11.1971, the appellant was not a party. The said suit had been
filed against the State of Punjab. The plaintiff therein had
intentionally avoided impleading the appellant as a partydefendant in the suit despite the fact that he had been staying
adjacent to the land in question and was very much aware of the
construction of the college building by the appellant and never
objected to the same. Infact, there was acquiescence between
said Bhagwant Singh and the State of Punjab and the said suit
filed by Bhagwant Singh was not seriously opposed by the State
of Punjab. Therefore, the decree obtained by Bhagwant Singh
was collusive in nature.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.