JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Main Case :
In this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, defendant Sarabjit Singh has assailed order dated
30.05.2012 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Additional Civil Judge
(Senior Division), Samana, thereby dismissing application (Annexure P-1)
filed by defendant-petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 read with Section 151
of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short CPC) for impleading Jagtar Singh
and Baljinder Singh as party defendants no.2 and 3 to the suit, which has
been instituted by respondent-plaintiff Sarjiwan Kumar against defendantpetitioner.
Plaintiff has filed suit for recovery of Rs.22,00,000/- against
defendant-petitioner, which includes Rs.11,00,000/- as refund of earnest
money and Rs.11,00,000/- as damages. The defendant allegedly agreed to
sell 79 kanals 04 marlas land to the plaintiff vide agreement dated
09.01.2006 and received Rs.11,00,000/- as earnest money. The defendant
claimed himself to be owner in possession of the said land on the basis of
some agreement in his favour, but the defendant has not been able to
perform the contract.
(2.) The defendant-petitioner, in his application, alleged that in fact,
both the parties as well as Jagtar Singh and Baljinder Singh were jointly
carrying on business as Property Dealers and they used to purchase and sell
land to earn profits by entering into agreement. In this process, agreement
of the aforesaid land was entered into with Mohinder Singh etc. in favour of
Jagtar Singh and earnest money of Rs.7,00,000/- was paid to vendors
Mohinder Singh etc. by both the parties herein along with Jagtar Singh and
Baljinder Singh jointly, although agreement was in favour of Jagtar Singh
only. Subsequently, Jagtar Singh agreed to sell the land to Baljinder Singh,
who further executed agreement thereof in favour of the defendant.
(3.) However, no money exchanged hands vide these subsequent agreements. In
January 2006, dispute arose between the partners and the defendant
demanded his share in the earnest money. Thereupon, his share in the
earnest money was paid after obtaining his signatures on blank stamp
papers, which had been used to prepare the impugned agreement by the
plaintiff. It was also alleged that plaintiff had lodged FIR, in which plaintiff
has effected compromise with Jagtar Singh and Baljinder Singh. On these
averments, defendant sought impleadment of Jagtar Singh and Baljinder
Singh as party defendants no.2 and 3 to the suit.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.