JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482
of the Code Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of the FIR
No. 154 dated 19.8.2007 registered under Section 420 of the Indian
Penal Code (IPC' for short) at Police Station Salem Tabri, Ludhiana
(Annexure P1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
(2.) The prosecution story, in brief, is that the complainant
booked one Oicial Company multi head Computerized Embroidery
Machine 12 head with sequin attachment from the accused. The
said machine was to be imported from China in December, 2005.
The complainant paid a sum of Rs. 10,60,000/- to the accused. The
machine was delivered in April 2006. The machine did not work
properly and, as a result, a complaint was made to the accused. The
accused tried his best to get the machine repaired but the fault could
not be corrected. The mechanics from China were called but they
could not correct the fault. However, they promised to exchange the
machine with a new one. When the machine was ready for delivery
in Ludhiana from China, the accused again demanded Rs. 1,50,000/-
towards ancillary charges. The said amount was paid to the accused
by the complainant through cheque. Although the complainant had
booked an automatic machine but he was delivered an ordinary
machine. The accused promised to return Rs. 4,10,000/- qua the
difference in sale price of the machine. A few machines were sent to
the accused from China for delivery but he sold the same in the open
market, instead of handing over the same to the complainant. The
accused issued a cheque of Rs. 1,50,000/- dated 17.2.2007 in favour
of the complainant but the same was dishonoured when it was
presented for encashment.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
no criminal offence was made out in the present case. In fact, the
dispute was purely civil in nature.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.