JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Sucha Singh was owner of the land measuring 384
Kanals 8 marlas situated in Village Killa Hakima, Tehsil Dhuri, District
Sangrur. On his death, the said land was inherited by his legal heirs
vide mutation No.2804 in equal 96 Kanals 2 Marlas in the name of
four co-sharers. As per the petitioners, the land being jointly held by
four brothers, they entered into the family partition of this land on
13.12.1972, which was reduced into writing. All the brothers had
signed this settlement. All the four brothers got 1/4
th
share each,
which was in their respective possession. It is alleged that Darbara
Singh, predecessor-in-interest of respondent Nos.5 and 6 sold the
entire land measuring 96 kanals 2 marlas through different sale
deeds. Despite this, respondent Nos.5 and 6 filed an application for
partition of total land measuring 384 kanals 8 marlas, claiming their
share of 93 kanals 5 marlas. The petitioners contested the same.
(2.) The Assistant Collector Ist Grade approved Naksha Be without
having regard to the settled position of law by passing a nonspeaking order. The petitioners filed an appeal before the Collector,
which was dismissed. They impugned the said order in revision
before the Commissioner, Patiala Division, Patiala, but the same was
also rejected by passing a non-speaking order. The only ground
taken by the Commissioner was that no family partition has been
found to have taken place between the parties. He, thus, non-suited
the petitioners by passing this cryptic order. The petitioners filed a
revision before the Financial Commissioner, who has also upheld the
order passed by the lower authorities and accordingly, the petitioner
has filed this petition before this Court.
(3.) The first submission made by learned counsel for the
petitioners is that since the brothers are contesting this partition
proceedings, efforts should be made to amicably resolve this dispute
or differences. Efforts indeed were made and counsel for the parties
had made a statement before this Court that settlement in this case
was not possible.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.