JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Challenge in this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is the order dated 5.1.2012 (Annexure P-7) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Panchkula, whereby the application filed by the plaintiff-respondents under order 14 Rule 5 CPC for reframing issue No.2, has been accepted.
(2.) Briefly stated, the plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for declaration and possession challenging the will allegedly executed on 6.12.2002 by Ishro Devi. The case of the plaintiffs is that Ishro Devi widow of Puran son of Udai Ram died intestate on 6.12.2002 and plaintiffs No. 1 to 4 being the sons of Kauri, sister of the husband of deceased Ishro Devi and plaintiff No. 5 being son of Nandi another sister of husband of Ishro Devi, are entitled to share held by Ishro Devi.
(3.) That suit was resisted. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiffs filed an application under Order 14 Rule 5 CPC for framing the correct issue, in which it is mentioned that issue No. 2 has been framed as under
"Whether the plaintiffs are entitled for the relief of the declaration to the effect that will alleged to be dated 6.12.2002 allegedly executed by Smt. Ishro Devi w/o Late Sh. Puran Singh s/o Sh. Udai Singh is false and fabricated document and the same is illegal, null and void and is not binding upon the rights of the plaintiffs as alleged -;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.