JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This petition has arisen out of the order dated 29.03.2010 passed
by the Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Bathinda, allowing the
appeal filed by Angrej Singh-respondent (hereinafter referred as 'the
respondent') against the order dated 20.02.2009 passed by the Additional
Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bathinda, dismissing his application for
setting aside the ex-parte order dated 20.11.2000.
(2.) The factual background of the case is that the respondent has
filed a suit for recovery on the basis of promissory note of Rs.30,000/-. The
said suit was decreed on 07.11.1986. Thereafter, respondent had filed an
execution petition, wherein, against the said decree of Rs.30,000/-, the land
owned by the Judgment Debtors-petitioners i.e. 2/3
rd
share out of 135
Kanals 4 Marlas, which comes to 90 Kanals 2 Marlas, was sold and the sale
was confirmed. The whole process took place in the absence of the
Judgment Debtors-petitioners. Whereupon, they had challenged the said sale
deed by filing an application on 12.12.1992, which was contested by the
respondent, but later on he failed to appear in the Court, therefore, he was
proceeded against exparte on 16.08.2000. Ultimately, the objection petition
filed by the Judgment Debtors-petitioners was allowed on 20.11.2000 and
the sale was set aside.
(3.) Aggrieved by the said order, the respondent filed an application
for setting aside the order dated 20.11.2000 on 02.05.2001. The trial Court
dismissed the said application on 20.02.2009 on the ground that the
application was hopelessly time barred i.e. filed after 8 months. The appeal
against the said order was filed by the respondent, which was allowed by the
Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Bathinda, vide order dated
29.03.2010, which is under challenge before this Court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.