SURENDER Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(P&H)-2012-11-19
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on November 17,2012

SURENDER Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

RAM CHAND GUPTA, J. - (1.) THE present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.64, dated 24.1.2011, under Sections 363, 372, 120-B, 216, 376 and 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Samalkha, District Panipat, Haryana.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner accused that prosecutrix was more than 18 years of age at the time of alleged occurrence and that she had married petitioner of her free consent and that they had also sought protection of their life and liberty by filing Crl.M.No.M-2838 of 2011 in this Court. Further contends that petitioner has been continuing in custody since 13.1.2012 and that trial is not likely to be concluded in near future as whereabouts of prosecutrix are not known to the prosecution and hence, she could not be examined.
(3.) THESE facts have not been disputed by learned State counsel. Even as per reply filed on behalf of the State, prosecutrix was more than 18 years of age at the time of alleged occurrence.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.