JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner
under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of
order dated 30.06.1994 (Annexure P/4) passed by respondent No.2
Collector, District Jind, whereby the petitioner has been compulsorily
retired from service and further directions to the respondents to allow
the petitioner to continue in service till his attaining the age of 58
years.
(2.) Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner joined the
service of Department of Revenue, Punjab (now Haryana) on
20.09.1961 as Patwari at Charkhi Dadri, District Bhiwani. Thereafter,
the petitioner was promoted as Field Kanoongo on 22.08.1985,
thereafter, further promoted as Office Kanoongo vide order dated
01.03.1993. It is averred in writ petition that the petitioner has
served for 34 long years while discharging his duty with zeal and
integrity. Through a communication dated 30.06.1994 (Annexure
P/4), the petitioner was sought to be retired from service on attaining
the age of 55 years by giving him three months' prior notice. The
retirement was based on the ground of public interest. As a
consequence of the aforesaid order, the petitioner was relieved from
his duty. Hence, this writ petition.
(3.) On notice, the respondents appeared and filed joint
written statement denying the averments made in the writ petition
and submitted that the petitioner has been compulsorily retired after
giving three months' notice and the case of the petitioner was
considered by the Officers Committee of the Chief Secretary to
Government of Haryana. The Committee had recommended that the
petitioner may be retired from service in the public interest after
giving him three months' notice. The information was received vide
letter dated 10.6.1994 (Annexure R-1). It is further submitted that
the petitioner has been retired in public interest.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the record.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.