JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Petitioner and his co-accused were tried for commission
of offence punishable under Sections 323, 325, 326 read with
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC" for short).
(2.) The trial Court, vide judgment/ order dated 12.10.2009/
14.10.2009 convicted and sentenced the petitioner and his coaccused qua commission of offence punishable under Sections 323,
325, 326 read with Section 34 IPC. Appeals filed against the said
judgment and order were dismissed by the Appellate Court vide
judgment dated 1.12.2011. Hence, the present revision petition by
the petitioner.
(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the
petitioner has undergone about ten months of actual sentence. The
injury attributed to petitioner on the person of Govardhan fell within
the ambit of Section 325 IPC, whereas, the injury attributed to
petitioner on the person of Chandu Lal was declared simple in
nature.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.