JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This is a revision petition for setting aside the Order dated
14.05.2011 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, vide which, an
application under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C for summoning Mahender for
the commission of offence punishable under Sections 302/34 IPC along
with other accused persons, was dismissed.
(2.) During the course of investigation, the challan was filed
against all the accused except Mahinder, who was placed in column No.2.
While praying for summoning the respondent, it was
contended that there are specific allegations in the FIR. The petitioner is
the eye witness and as per him, Mahinder was present there having danda
in his hand and when the petitioner tried to rescue his brother Ombir then
Mahinder gave a danda blow on his right shoulder. It is further stated that
as per the medico-legal report, the petitioner had received injury on his
right shoulder. Moreover, he has appeared as prosecution witness and
corroborated his statement in the FIR.
(3.) Learned counsel for the respondent-State, on the other hand,
pointed out that the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon had gone into the
detail of the M.L.R of the deceased, as well as, of the complainant and
found that the M.L.R of the petitioner belies his utterances. There were
only two injuries on his person viz a viz a reddish black bruise over right
shoulder with black abrasion 3x3 cms, in size. Secondly, swelling over
scalp right parietal region and that it was hard to believe that a lathi blow
gave a bruise of 3x3 cms. size on the body covered under the clothes and
that the statement of the petitioner has not been corroborated with the
statement of others.
Heard.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.