JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Challenge in the present writ petition is to Regulation 15 of the
Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code
and Related Matter) Regulations, 2007 (for short the Regulations), as
amended vide notification dated 24.05.2010 in respect of security amount
alleging it to be unjust, arbitrary, illegal and ultra vires of the Electricity Act,
2003.
(2.) The relevant Regulation reads as under:
15. Security (Consumption)
15.1 different categories of consumers will maintain Security
(Consumption) as below:
15.1.1. Consumers other than Large Supply Industrial consumers will
maintain as security with the Licensee an amount equivalent to
consumption charge (i.e. Fixed and variable charges as applicable) for two
and a half months where bi-monthly billing is applicable and one and a
half months in case of monthly billing, during the period of agreement for
supply of electricity.
(3.) It is averred that the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory
Commission was constituted under the repealed Electricity Regulatory
Commission Act, 1998 and the same has been notified as the State
Commission under Section 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short 'the
Act'). The Act enumerates functions of the State Commission which, inter
alia, relates to determination of tariff for generation, supply, transmission
and wheeling of electricity, wholesale, bulk or retail, as the case may be
within the State. The State Commission is empowered to frame Regulations
consistent with the provisions of the Act and Rules in terms of Section 181
of the Act. It is pleaded that earlier the interest free security against
consumption was deposited by the members of the petitioner Association
ranging up to 30% of the monthly consumption called as 'Advance
Consumption Deposit'. The impugned regulations including Regulations 14
to 20 notified on 29.07.2007 are said to be without any statutory support as
it is averred that there is no provision to base the Security (Consumption)
on the basis of the billing cycle. It is alleged that the billing cycle is
established by the Commission for its convenience and it is wrong to link
with the quantum of Security (Consumption). Initial Security
(Consumption) as per Regulation 15 was an amount equivalent to
consumption charges for three months, where monthly bill is applicable and
two months in case of monthly billing as security during the period of
agreement for supply of electricity. The earlier notification prior to
amendment on 24.05.2010 reads as under:
15. Security (Consumption)
15.1 Consumers will maintain with the Licensee an amount
equivalent to consumption charges (i.e. fixed charges and variable
charges as applicable) for three months where bi-monthly billing is
applicable and two months in case of monthly billing as security
during the period of agreement for supply of electricity.
Consumption charges will be worked out on the basis of average
monthly consumption of an existing consumer over a period of
twelve months immediately before coming into force of these
Regulations.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.