JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Plaintiffs Har Narain and Lakshmi Chand sons of Aaram have
filed this second appeal, having been non-suited by both the courts below.
Plaintiffs and defendants are sons and daughters of Aaram.
(2.) Defendant no. 2 Smt. Mewa has since died and is represented by her son
and legal representative Rajender respondent no. 2.
(3.) Plaintiffs obtained consent decree dated 21.4.1981 against their
father Aaram thereby declaring the plaintiffs to be owners in possession of
the suit land measuring 24 kanals 1 marla on the basis of alleged family
settlement. Aaram, father of the parties, died on 18.12.1992, leaving
behind the present parties and his widow Atlo as his legal heirs. Later on,
Atlo also died. Plaintiff's case is that defendant no. 1 Revti Parkash
obtained signatures/thumb impressions of plaintiffs and defendants no. 2 to
4 on the pretext of filing cases regarding land which was under occupancy
tenancy of Aaram and his brother Balram. However, the said papers were
misused by defendant no. 1 who by instituting suit No.132 of 3.4.1993
challenged earlier consent decree dated 21.4.1981 and obtained ex parte
decree dated 1.6.1994 thereby setting aside decree dated 21.4.1981.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.