JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The present revision petition has been filed against the
impugned order dated 02.09.2011, vide which application filed by the
prosecution under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
(for brevity 'the Code') has been allowed and the petitioner has been
summoned as an additional accused.
(2.) Briefly, the facts of the case as mentioned in the revision
petition are that the complainant and his family members were in
illegal possession of Shamlat Deh which belongs to Gram Panchayat
and who wanted to construct a Dharamshala on the said land.
(3.) Demarcation was done by BDO on 15/16.05.2010. Some dispute
also arose at the time of demarcation. Complainant party lodged a
complaint against the accused persons including the present
petitioner and accordingly FIR No.59 dated 27.05.2010 under
Sections 148, 149, 323, 506, 436 and 429 IPC was registered
against the accused persons. After investigation, the challan was
filed against respondents No.2 to 10 but the petitioner was found
innocent. All the accused persons were charge sheeted under
Sections 148, 149, 323, 506, 436 and 429 IPC. After recording
statement of complainant, an application was moved by the
prosecution under Section 319 of the Code which was allowed and
present petitioner was summoned as an additional accused vide
order dated 02.09.2011. The order of summoning of the petitioner is
under challenge in the present revision petition.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.