JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) By this common judgment, the present
petition bearing Crl. Misc. No. M-21409 of 2009 and
other eighteen connected petitions bearing
Crl. Misc. No. M-22250 of 2011, Crl. Misc. No. M-22933
of 2011, Crl. Misc. No. M-24949 of 2011, Crl. Misc.
No. M-24893 of 2011, Crl. Misc. No. M-25100 of 2011,
Crl. Misc. No. M-25519 of 2011, Crl. Misc. No. M-25532
of 2011, Crl. Misc. No. M-25533 of 2011, Crl. Misc.
No. M-25546 of 2011, Crl. Misc. No. M-25696 of 2011,
Crl. Misc. No. M-25775 of 2011, Crl. Misc. No. M-26329
of 2011, Crl. Misc. No. M-26043 of 2011, Crl. Misc.
No. M-26044 of 2011, Crl. Misc. No. M-26280 of 2011,
Crl. Misc. No. M-26521 of 2011, Crl. Misc. No. M-26591
of 2011 and Crl. Misc. No. M-27205 of 2011 shall be
decided. All these petitions have been filed by
the petitioners, inter-alia, (1) to quash the
respective FIRs registered under Sections
406,409,420,415,468,471,34,120-B IPC (2) to quash
the composite order dated 8.3.2011 passed by
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurgaon
rejecting the cancellation report(s).
(2.) The necessary facts for the disposal
of the petitions are as under:
M/s. Champak Textiles Pvt. Ltd. (in
short, 'Champak Textiles') was owner of land
measuring 2545 square yards in Shah Industrial
Area, Plot No. 1, Veera Deasi Road, Andheri (West),
Mumbai. Ashok Mahindru and Anand Mahindru were the
Directors of the aforesaid Champak Textiles.
Another company by the name of M/s Ozo Media Estate
Ltd. (for short, 'Ozo Media') was floated on
30.12.2005. Ashok Mahindru was appointed as
Chairman and Vineet Handa as Managing Director.
Another company by the name of M/s. Ozo Marketing
Ltd. (for short, 'Ozo Marketing) was floated on
1.5.2006 for marketing of project to be constructed
on the land of Champak Textiles. Prior to the
floating of the Ozo Marketing, R. K. Anand was
appointed as Chief Executive Officer vide order
dated 27.2.2006. One R. K. Anand, through his
company, namely, M/s. Convenience Enterprises
Private Limited (for short, 'Convenience
Enterprises') started registration for allotment of
commercial spaces aggregating to 53500 square feet,
out of which registration for 5000 square feet got
cancelled due to dishonour of cheque in the
proposed commercial complex from forty customers
which was of Rs. 29,13,89,000/- value. Out of the
aforesaid amount, R. K. Anand deposited an amount of
Rs. 13,84,20,188/-. Total forty investors/
allottees applied for allotment of spaces in the
proposed complex in the prescribed proforma.
R. K. Anand registered allotment of spaces at
different rates with certain terms and conditions,
including in the name of himself and also in the
name of some other close relations but it was
registered at a lower rate. A difference arose
between Ashok Mahindru and R. K. Anand and,
therefore, a legal notice was issued by Ashok
Mahindru for appointment of an arbitrator. Various
petitions under the provisions of Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'the Act') were
filed before Delhi High Court. One hundred and
eleven petitions were filed by the investors under
Sections 9 and 11 of the Act, out of which 97
petitions were dismissed by Delhi High Court on
9.1.2008 for want of jurisdiction and remaining
fourteen petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.
Thereafter twenty four petitions were filed by
R. K. Anand and other investors under Sections 9 and
48 of the Act before Bombay High Court. Bombay
High Court dismissed the petitions under Section 9
of the Act on merits vide order dated 8.2.2008 and
subsequently appeals filed were dismissed by the
Hon'ble Division Bench on 3.3.2008. The petitions
under Section 11 of the Act filed for appointment
of Arbitrator were dismissed as withdrawn before
the Hon'ble Bombay High Court on 14.3.2008.
(3.) Ashok Mahindru filed a complaint dated
30.4.2007 against R. K. Anand and Vineet Handa for
cheating and causing wrongful loss to petitioner
No. 1 M/s. Ozo Media in conspiracy with each other
before Police Station DLF Gurgaon. With a view to
counter blast the aforesaid complaint, R. K. Anand
filed three complaints on 23.5.2007 under Sections
156(3) CrPC seeking registration of FIR before the
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi against M/s Ozo Media Estate Ltd. , Ashok
Mahindru, Vikas Sethi, Anand Mahindru, Atul
Mahindru, Aseem Mahindru, Ram Lal, Saket Tiwari,
Rajeev Gupta, R. C. Beri, S. K. Beri, M/s. Champak
Textiles Pvt. Ltd. , Anil Verma, Ravi Gupta, Jagdish
Chawla, Ms. Shvangini Mahindru and Vineet Handa.
The said complaints were dismissed vide order dated
28.5.2007. The order dated 28.5.2007 was challenged
in Crl. Revision No. 438 of 2007 before the Hon'ble
Delhi High Court which was dismissed on the ground
that dispute was between the parties and the State
had no concern or interest in the litigation.
Meanwhile, R. K. Anand filed forteen complaints,
whereas, two complaints were filed by his nephew,
who was working as Executive Director of Ashok
Mahindru, before the court of competent
jurisdiction under Section 156(3) CrPC. On the
direction issued by the Magistrate, sixteen FIRs
under various offences were registered. Three more
FIRs were registered on the transfer of the
complaints, which were initially filed by R. K. Anand
from Delhi to Gurgaon. Total nineteen FIRs were
registered. The FIRs so registered are numbered as
under:
"FIR nos. 154 of 2007, 157 of 2007, 158 of
2007, 159 of 2007, 164 of 2007, 165 of
2007, 166 of 2007, 168 of 2007, 169 of
2008, 170 of 2007, 171 of 2007, 176 of
2007, 177 of 2007, 178 of 2007, 179 of
2007, 180 of 2007, 30 of 2008, 31 of 2008
and 32 of 2008.
Dis-satisfied with the allegations leveled in the
FIRs, which were sixteen in number, registered in
the year 2007, M/s Ozo Media and others have
approached this Court through CWP No. 9403 of 2007
which was disposed of by this Court vide order
dated 24.7.2007. In the aforesaid writ petition,
a direction was issued that the complaints, which
ultimately took the form of FIRs, are to be
investigated by Satinder Kumar Gupta, DCP, Gurgaon
(East). Subsequently, three more FIRs were
included in the said investigation.
;