JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Present appeal has been filed by Roshan Lal, who was
nominated as an accused in a case FIR No.674 dated 23.11.1997
registered at Police Station Dharuhera under Section 302 IPC.
The appellant is stated to have given a solitary Lathi (stick)
blow on the head of Sultan on 22
nd
November, 1997 at about 1.00 p.m.
The houses of deceased Sultan and his sister-in-law Vidya Devi PW-1
adjoin the house of accused-appellant Roshan Lal. The appellant on 23
rd
March, 1998 was charged by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rewari for
an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC for having caused the
murder of Sultan. He pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
(2.) The trial Judge vide impugned judgment dated 9
th
April, 2001
observed that the occurrence was a sudden affair and had occurred on
the spur of the moment without any premeditation, and held the appellant
guilty of an offence punishable under Section 304 IPC. Vide an order
dated 16
th
April, 2001 he sentenced the appellant to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/-
in default of payment whereof to further undergo rigorous imprisonment
for one year under Section 304 IPC.
(3.) The following portion of the impugned judgment is required
to be reproduced:
"25. On the other hand on behalf of the defence, it is
rightly submitted that as that the accused Roshan is a
young man with no previous criminal record and the
circumstances of the occurrence clearly makes out as that it
can not be said that he had an intention to cause death of
Sultan or that he was knowing that his act was so
imminently dangerous, that it must in all probability, would
cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death
and with this knowledge or intention he caused such an act.
The act of Roshan of causing blow with lathi on the head of
Sultan in the circumstances would bring it within the four
corners of the offence of culpable homicide not amounting
to murder as in such circumstances he could be simply
presumed knowing the normal consequences of his act that
by doing it he was likely by such act to cause the death of
Sultan. As such, only the offence punishable under Section
304 IPC and not under Section 302 IPC has been
established.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.