MANOJ KUMAR PATHAK Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(P&H)-2012-10-703
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on October 05,2012

MANOJ KUMAR PATHAK Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) The present petition has been filed for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure in FIR no. 271 dated 21.08.2011 under Sections 147/149/332/189/185/186/506/504 IPC, registered at police station Naraingarh, District Ambala.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record including the impugned order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala dismissing anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner.
(3.) This Court while issuing notice of motion on 06.09.2012 passed the following order:- "Crl.M.No.52661 of 2012 Application is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.No.M-27375 of 2012 Contends that it is a case of no injury and that there are only vague allegations of intimidating public servant. It is further contended that moreover petitioner is having no concern with Naraingarh Sugar Mill, enquiry regarding which was pending before the complainant as petitioner was posted as General Manager of Naraingarh Distillery Limited. It is also contended that all the offences except offence under Section 332 Indian Penal Code are bailable one and, however, it is a case of no injury and no offence under Section 332 Indian Penal Code is made out. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana, for 5.10.2012. However, in the meantime, petitioner is directed to join the investigation and in case he is arrested, he shall be released on interim bail by the Arresting Officer to his satisfaction subject to compliance of conditions specified under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.";


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.