JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) The petitioner-Sarpanch has challenged the resolution of
'No Confidence Motion' stated to have been passed against him on
22.10.2010 being illegal and arbitrary on the ground that the same
was not carried by the requisite two-third majority.
(2.) The petitioner was elected as Sarpanch of Gram
Panchayat Ghuhanpur on a post reserved for Scheduled Caste
(Male). The petitioner was elected as Scheduled Caste (Male)
Punch. The Panchayat in the village consists of five Punches. No
Confidence Motion was passed against the petitioner by 3 Punches
out of 5. The charge of the Panchayat accordingly is given to
authorised Punch-respondent No.5. The petitioner would point out
that incidentally the provisions of Section 19 of the Panchayat Raj
Act, 1994, which provided for removal of a Sarpanch by way of No
Confidence Motion if voted by 2/3
rd
members have been deleted from
the Statute in the year 2011.
(3.) The plea of the petitioner in the present case, however, is
that 3 Punches out of total 5 would not constitute two-third majority
and, accordingly, it is urged that the resolution is illegal and, thus,
cannot be sustained. Reference is made to the precedents settling
this position of law in a clear and categorical manner. Still, this
resolution has been affirmed by the official respondents and the
petitioner stands removed from the office of Sarpanch.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.