JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioners have sought quashing of
Criminal complaint No. 158 dated 27.8.2009 (Annexure P-1) titled as
Krishna Rani vs. Pritam Kaur and others, under Sections 452/ 323/
382/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC' for short) and all the
subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.
(2.) During the pendency of the petition, parties arrived at a
compromise. Vide order dated 26.3.2012, parties were directed to
appear before the trial Court and the trial Court was directed to send
its report qua the genuineness of the compromise after recording the
statements of the parties.
(3.) In pursuance to the said order, the trial Court, after
recording of the statements of the parties, has reported that the
compromise effected between the parties was voluntary and of their
free will. Statement of respondent No.2 has also been attached with
the report. The same reads as under:-
"That I have filed present complaint case under Sections
452/ 323/ 382/ 148/ 149 IPC against the accused person
Pritam Kaur (since deceased), Charanjit Singh,
Pavittarpal Kaur, Sikandar Singh and Parminder Singh @
Raja @ Palwinder Singh. I have effected compromise
with accused persons with the help of respectables and I
have received Rs. 50,000/- as cost of litigation. This
compromise has been arrived at by me out of my free will
and without any coercion or fraud or pressure. We both
the parties have agreed with the writ petition filed before
Hon'ble High Court. The compromise is for the welfare of
both the parties. I do not want to further proceed against
accused persons. I have no objection if the present
complaint case titled as 'Krishna Rani vs. Charanjit Singh
and others under Sections 452/ 323/ 382/ 148/ 149 IPC
and the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed
against the accused persons.";
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.