BALJINDER SINGH BALJINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
LAWS(P&H)-2021-1-206
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on January 19,2021

Baljinder Singh Baljinder Singh Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents

JUDGEMENT

RAJ MOHAN SINGH,J. - (1.) The case has been taken up for hearing through video-conferencing.
(2.) Petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case bearing FIR No.0401 dated 10.11.2020 registered under Section 295-A IPC at Police Station Division No.8,District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana.
(3.) On 11.12.2020, following order was passed by this Court:- "The case has been taken up for hearing through video-conferencing. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0401 dated 10.11.2020. Allegations against the petitioner are that he uploaded a facebook status in which following words were written "Jab Jaib me hai money, toh kya krega sala shani " Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid FIR was registered due to malice as the petitioner started a medical store in the name and style of "Guru Nanak Modi Khana" where he along with his team had started selling medicine on controlled rates. During the course of aforesaid business, the petitioner came to know about ongoing fraud in retailing of medicines vis-a-vis generic medicines which were being sold at the rate of branded medicines. The aforesaid unethical practice was exposed by the petitioner and the lodging of aforesaid FIR is the handiwork of medicine mafia. Earlier also the petitioner was victimized by way of registration of FIR No. 289 dated 20.08.2020 for the same offence in which allegations were made that he did not use word "Shri" before the name of "Ram" word "Mata" before the name of "Sita" and word "Bhagat" before the name of "Hanuman". Learned counsel further submitted that pronouncing the aforesaid words in the context of money in the pocket is in common parlance in country side area where so many phrases are prevailing. All such utterances are not offences, rather careless attempt cannot be termed as offence under Section 295 (A) IPC. It penalizes only those acts of insults to those varieties of attempts to insult religion or religious belief of a class of citizens which are perpetrated with deliberate and malicious intention of outraging religious feelings of that class of citizens. At this stage without adverting to merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to direct the petitioner to join investigation on 16.12.2020 at 11 AM. In the event of his arrest he shall be granted interim bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. Adjourned to 19.01.2021." ;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.