ORIENTAL CONSTRUCTION CO. Vs. ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, PWD (B AND R) AND ANR.
LAWS(P&H)-2011-4-250
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on April 28,2011

Oriental Construction Co. Appellant
VERSUS
Engineer -In -Chief, Pwd (B And R) And Anr. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

Hemant Gupta, J. - (1.) THE Petitioner -company was awarded contract for up gradation, widening and strengthening of the existing road from Village Taloda (on Jind -Safidon State Highway) to Dhatrath, Khanda upto Alewa (on Jind - Assandh State Highway) and Kandela (on Jind -Assandh State Highway) to Jind -Safidon road via Khokhari - Bohatwala - Dalamwala in Jind District. An agreement dated 11.07.2002 was executed between the parties in this respect.
(2.) AS per the said contract, the total cost of project was Rs. 493 lacs. As per the Petitioner, it completed the contract and handed over the site to the Respondents on 28.02.2005 and also raised final bill on 09.05.2006. The gross amount of the bill was Rs. 4,87,05,949.90. The Respondents made payment of Rs. 21,82,512/ - to the Petitioner on 22.05.2006. It is asserted by the Petitioner that a sum of Rs. 2,66,71,943/ - is still payable by the Respondents in respect of which, the Petitioner raised a claim on 10.10.2006. The details of such claim are as under: Sr. Particulars No. Amount (i) Less incurred due to non -issuance of letter to IOCL for Release of Bitumen and loss on account of rent paid for idle machinery, labour, administrative and office expenses. Rs. 17,78,000/ - (ii) Loss incurred due to mixing of Stone and Bajri in GSB including extra items used and cost of extra labour used for mixing material. Rs. 19,20,2000/ - (iii) Loss due to filling of Potholes and Undulations. Rs. 5175000/ - (iv) Loss due to non -payment of E/W under GSB area. Rs. 10,29,000/ - (v) Loss due to earthwork done and removed in villages. Rs. 4,53,600/ - (vi) Escalation in the cost of raw -material on account of the delay caused by the Department. Rs. 1,00,00,000/ - (vii) Interest @ 18% on the aforesaid amount from the date it became due, outstanding and payable till realization alongwith pendente lite and future interest. Rs. 63,16,343/ - Total Rs. 2,66,71,943/ - The said claim of the Petitioner was declined by the Executive Engineer on 28.11.2006 (Annexure P -3). It was, thereafter, on 18.01.2007 (Annexure P -4), the Petitioner requested for appointment of an Arbitrator. Since no Arbitrator was appointed, the Petitioner invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act').
(3.) IN reply, it is pointed out that the Petitioner has received the final payment without any reservation in terms of the final bill raised by the Petitioner and that there is not dispute arising out of the contract and that there is no issue which is arbitral. It is inter -alia pointed out to the following effect: 2. That the Petitioner raised a final bill for Rs. 4,87,05,949.90 which was value of total work done during the entire period of contract and out of the said sum, the Petitioner had already received Rs. 4,61,00,151.99 upto the previous bills and thus only a balance of Rs. 26,05,797.91 was remaining which has been paid after making the statutory and permitted deduction viz. income tax, education cess, surcharge, sales tax etc. and net payable amount of Rs. 21,82,512/ - was paid to the contractor/Petitioner and the same was accepted without any protest. It is, thus, clear that full accord and satisfaction has been reached in the present case and the Petitioner is estopped from raising any claim after final bill. A copy of final bill as approved is annexed hereto and marked as Annexure R -1.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.