Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. - (1.) IN this case, following order was passed on 06.7.2010: - Present: Mr. Rajiv Prashad, Advocate, for the petitioners The learned counsel for the petitioners does not challenge the order passed by the learned Appellate Authority on merits and prays that in view of the fact that the petitioner, who is a widow lady, is running business here, be given sufficient time to vacate the premises. Notice of motion for 19.8.2010. Eviction stayed.
(2.) AFTER the aforesaid order was passed, the lawyer has been changed. Now, Mr. N.K. Verma, Advocate, holding the brief on behalf of the petitioners states that he wanted to argue the case on merit. I am afraid, this kind of permission cannot be granted in view of the order passed by this Court on 06.7.2010.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners then submitted that some reasonable time may be granted to vacate the premises subject to payment of entire arrears of rent.;